| 
|  |  | Dear Laurent, 
 "LS" == Laurent Siebenmann writes:
 
 LS> Incidentally, the AMS openly invites others to complete and
 LS> support the WLCY variant of the AMs WNCY fonts.  It would be
 LS> ideal if your group would do this since this list is well placed
 LS> to debug and criticize them, if that proves necessary.  The full
 LS> WLCY is a smaller job than the one you have just done for the WN
 LS> fonts!
 
 moreover, making fonts with the help of a small script makes the job
 of creating missing WLCY fonts very simple. :) so it could be done.
 
 i have one question. WLCY fonts remove all ligatures but the following:
 
 '      ' => '' (quoteright quoteright -> quotedblright)
 -      - => endash
 endash - => emdash
 
 In WNCY fonts, there exists also the following non-letter ligatures:
 
 [ [ => guillemotleft
 ] ] => guillemotright
 
 (guillemets in WNCY fonts are also accessible via characters < and >
 without ligatures; in other cyrillic font encodings, guillemets are
 accessible via ligatures << and >>).
 
 The question is: what one should do with guillemets in WLCY (and WL)
 fonts:
 
 * do not provide ligatures (as currently in WLCY), so the guillemets
 are accessible only via characters < and > (and commands
 \guillemotleft, \guillemotright)
 
 * do not remove ligatures [[ and ]]
 
 * remove ligatures [[ and ]], but add ligatures << and >> (so
 guillemets will be accessible both as < > and << >>).
 
 Best,
 v.
 
 
 |  |