Return-Path: Received: from [62.76.169.38] (HELO video) by vsu.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 3795913 for CyrTeX-en@vsu.ru; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:13:45 +0400 To: (Cyrillic TeX Users Group) Subject: Re: none References: From: Vladimir Volovich Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:13:57 +0400 In-Reply-To: (Oliver Corff's message of "Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:02:24 +0400") Message-ID: Lines: 35 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.103 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii "OC" == Oliver Corff writes: OC> To whom it may concern: I ran a compilation test on the the OC> complete list of file names of the LH fonts. The file name list OC> was script-generated (a perl script grepping all .fd files for OC> script/size-combinations). OC> If not already known to you I'd like to report that with OC> mfmode=ljfive the following fonts failed to be compiled: OC> rx{fb,fs}{2986,3583} rx{ff,fi}{0500,0600,0700,0800} OC> thus a total of 12 fonts failed. are you able to generate the corresponding EC fonts? i.e.: ec{fb,fs}{2986,3583} ec{ff,fi}{0500,0600,0700,0800} I had problems with these fonts too, and it seems that the parameters in the EC fonts are bad. in particular, i had problems generating the following EC fonts: ecbm{0600,0800} ecfb{2488,2986,3583} ecff{0500,0600,0700,0800} ecfi{0500,0600,0700,0800} ecfs{2488,2986,3583} and also ecit{2986,3583} at big resolution. As the LH fonts are based on parameters of EC fonts, the problems of EC fonts migrate to LH fonts. :( Best, v.