Return-Path: Received: from ic.vrn.ru ([195.98.64.65] verified) by vsu.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3.1) with ESMTP id 1815786 for CyrTeX-en@vsu.ru; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:36:51 +0400 Received: from topo.math.u-psud.fr (topo.math.u-psud.fr [129.175.50.180]) by ic.vrn.ru (8.8.8/Relcom-2A) with ESMTP id KAA19466 for ;Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:33:19 +0400 (MSD) Received: from lcs by topo.math.u-psud.fr with local (Exim 2.10 #1) id 13Penm-0001A1-00 for CyrTeX-en@vsu.ru; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 07:34:46 +0200 To: CyrTeX-en@vsu.ru Subject: Re: Russian keyboards (was left and right double quotes) Message-Id: From: Laurent Siebenmann Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 07:34:46 +0200 Dear Petr Ovchenkov, and others, You write: > the common practice is switch to another language register I think this is a very effective solution that should be used in the West to keep an ASCII keyboard instantly available, rather then suffer the sort of difficulty I mentioned: > I notice that on a French Windows keyboard, \ requires a > double modifier key!!!!! Also ` and ~ are *highly* > inaccessible (3 keystrokes each). In a generic editor here in > France, TeX is not well served by Wintel. By preference I work with Macintosh computers on which keyboards are almost totally programmable. With little effort and no expense, you can change the codes emitted by the keys and also (within limits) the function unleashed by most key combinations. So I have programmed an ASCII keyboard, and even a Cyrillic keyboard fitting standard fonts to each. Any sign of such programmability for Wintel machines (or Lintel or ...)?? These comments diverge from the point of my question which rather seeks to get acceptable results for *everyone* on the most *mediocre* and *varying* equipment anywhere in the world outside of Russia. Hence the emphasis on ASCII. I'll explain my line of thought on this track as soon as I get rid of needless conflicts with the realities of Russian typing -- such as Mikhail has just pointed out. Cheers Larry S