From: "=?utf-8?b?0JDQvdC00YDQtdC5INCf0LDQvdC+0LI=?=" Received: by relay1.vsu.ru (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 5.2.5) with PIPE id 101741645; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:37:54 +0400 Received: from canopus.iacp.dvo.ru ([62.76.7.214] verified) by relay1.vsu.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.5) with ESMTPS id 101740550 for CyrTeX-ru@vsu.ru; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:28:07 +0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=relay1.vsu.ru; client-ip=62.76.7.214; envelope-from=panov@canopus.iacp.dvo.ru Received: from canopus.iacp.dvo.ru (IDENT:1000@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by canopus.iacp.dvo.ru (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m63MS8Gk015010 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:28:08 +1100 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by canopus.iacp.dvo.ru (8.14.2/8.12.3/Submit) id m63MS8Pt015009 for CyrTeX-ru@vsu.ru; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:28:08 +1100 Reply-To: panov@canopus.iacp.dvo.ru Organization: Institute for Automation and Control Processes To: "Cyrillic TeX Users Group" Subject: Re: shape of the yat Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:28:08 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807040928.08399.panov@canopus.iacp.dvo.ru> X-Greylist: Sender is SPF-compliant, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (canopus.iacp.dvo.ru [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:28:08 +1100 (VLAST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on canopus.iacp.dvo.ru X-DrWeb-FlyTrap-Class: NON-SPAM X-DrWeb-FlyTrap-CID: 1 X-DrWeb-FlyTrap-ID: 6922256 На самом деле это ошибка шрифтов LH. Верхняя засечка у "ятя" должна быть такой же, как и у "ф". Ещё кстати пересекающий штрих у "ятя" следовало сделать симметричным относительно вертикального. On 2 июля 2008, Alexey Kryukov wrote: > On Tuesday 01 July 2008, Ruprecht von Waldenfels wrote: > > One problem remains, however: the strange shape of the yat, with a > > small hachek on top of it. Is there any way to remedy this? > > That's a correct shape for a Cyrillic ascender, which BTW > was much more common in pre-1917 printing than Latin-styled > ascenders with a serif at the left side. The lowercase Cyrillic > "f" also often has its ascender and descender designed in this > style. -- Андрей Панов panov /@/ canopus.iacp.dvo.ru