Return-Path: <vvv@vvv.vsu.ru>
Received: from video.uic.vsu.ru ([62.76.169.38] verified)
  by vsu.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.2b8)
  with ESMTP id 1171493 for CyrTeX-en@vsu.ru; Sat, 18 Dec 1999 14:19:52 +0300
Sender: vvv@video.uic.vsu.ru
To: CyrTeX-en@vsu.ru
Subject: Re: *complete* WLCY
From: Vladimir Volovich <vvv@vvv.vsu.ru>
Date: 18 Dec 1999 14:20:21 +0300
Message-ID: <ey3dt0jy16.fsf@video.uic.vsu.ru>
Lines: 24
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Dear Laurent,

i've put today a tarball with WLCY virtual fonts and files for LaTeX
(from the cyrillic bundle): ot2enc.def and ot2*.fd (in particular,
ot2wlcyr.fd, ot2wlcyss.fd), to
ftp://ftp.vsu.ru/pub/tex/wlcyfonts-991218.tar.gz

these fonts are without << >> ligatures (as in original WLCY fonts);
guillemets are accessible via < > and \guillemotleft, \guillemotright.
should these ligatures be added? will AMS agree to do this change?

please test this and then we could ask AMS to add them to official
AMSFONTS.

usage is simple:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[OT2,OT1]{fontenc}
\def\cyr{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wlcyr}\selectfont}
\begin{document}
this is a test: {\cyr proba pera}
\end{document}

	Best regards, -- Vladimir.