|
Dear Vladimir,
> BTW, Laurent, some time ago you said that you will try to
> ask AMS to include the wlcy virtual fonts (available at
> ftp.vsu.ru/pub/tex) in their fonts officially (instead of
> less complete wlcy fonts available at CTAN). How about
> this?
The wlcy* virtual fonts are the wncy* fonts with the
troublesome tho useful ligatures simply removed.
I am unreservedly in favor of the AMS accepting your
support for the wlcy* fonts. That seems an ideal
arrangement. I failed to promote this to Barbara while she
was preoccupied with the math additions to unicode.
My sincere apologies.
There was the question whether << and >> should be
ligatures, and a couple of others. That is an issue
Barbara may now have an opinion on.
Best wishes,
Laurent S.
To: <CyrTeX-en@vsu.ru> (Cyrillic TeX Users Group)
Subject: Re: *complete* WLCY etc
From: Vladimir Volovich <vvv@vvv.vsu.ru>
Date: 19 Dec 1999 12:26:55 +0300
"LS" == Laurent Siebenmann writes:
LS> You might announce your alpha postings on the tex-fonts list
LS> since it is in the west that WN/WL are most used.
maybe you can do this announce better, because you can explain the
importance of WLCY fonts to west people better than i. :)
LS> With no change in kern/ligs the AMS has given consent in
LS> advance!
that would be nice.
|
|